It is possible to add DynEQ4 or MultiBD Compressor 4 ?
Great idea! If possible, at least for the stereo master. Other than that, a simple De-Esser in the input processing section would help a lot.
+1
Yes, a 4-Band dynamic equaliser in the FX-Section would help a lot.
+1 On 4 band dynamic eq at least on Main L&R output but available at channel level would be such an invaluable tool. At channel level, even if it was only 2 bands of fully adjustable dynamic eq available to add in any channel is way better then not having any. I would of course prefer more bands available them especially on output level and 4 sound reasonable.
Although can use dynamic eq for deessing, i recmmend adding stand alone De-esser, i standard at the channel level that can be turned on or off with at least some adjustment to dial it it good for that channel. It could be kept fairly simple and still be very effective.
+1 On 4 band dynamic eq at least on Main L&R output but available at channel level would be such an invaluable tool. At channel level, even if it was only 2 bands of fully adjustable dynamic eq available to add in any channel is way better then not having any. I would of course prefer more bands available them especially on output level and 4 sound reasonable.
That may be a big request for a CQ considering it is a “entry level” mixer.
That may be a big request for a CQ considering it is a “entry level” mixer.
The CQ has features far beyond entry level mixer. AMM, antifdb, autogain, many separate sends, fx, and so on. Automatic Dynamic control of channels level is useful for conference, but I never use it for a musical show. I wish an option to use the amount of power used for AMM for dynamic eq instead, much more useful for any musicians.
+++1 y PRE-DELAY for FX.
The CQ has features far beyond entry level mixer. AMM, antifdb, autogain, many separate sends, fx, and so on. Automatic Dynamic control of channels level is useful for conference, but I never use it for a musical show. I wish an option to use the amount of power used for AMM for dynamic eq instead, much more useful for any musicians.
At least for me the auto gain and antifb are what makes it geared for the entry level market, the AMM function is a bonus at that level.
t least for me the auto gain and antifb are what makes it geared for the entry level market, the AMM function is a bonus at that level.
I got it. It’s about what “entry level” means… for me it’s a stripped version of the more pricey devices. Less channels same features. Or same channels, but with less options. Autogain and antifbk are at pro level. I love how autogain act, I wish my analog board had such a feature! Antifdbk is on par or better than pro dedicated device: it tracks wonderfully, almost no squeal, keep integrity of the audio.
A CQ for me is a pro device in a compact format. If I were a dummy and I buy it for conference, using the AMM and quick channel, it’s a perfect choice, but it’s a waste for such a product: quality of ADA, fx, channels strip, routing. As musician and tech I would like having same other features on board to have a portable unit, for example a “dynamic eq band on/off” autogain-like (software controlled and optimized, no need for extra parameters…). I wish each band of the eq could be dynamic, so we could de-essing and pumping or controlling each single channel.
+1 for predelay on fx!
Would love to see 6band PEQ iso 4band & Feedback destroyer on outputs, specially on L-R!
Dynamic eq would be nice, even only one band
+1 for dynamic EQ! <3
+1
For 4 band DynEQ or MBComp at mainLR and Output 1-6