# SQ+ in comparison to Qu-3 **URL:** \ **Category:** SQ General Discussions\ **Created:** [11 November 2026 10:25 UTC](https://forums.allen-heath.com/t/sq-in-comparison-to-qu-3/33365 "2026-11-11T10:25:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![SQuser](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forums.allen-heath.com/squser/32/1200_2.png) [@SQuser](https://forums.allen-heath.com/u/SQuser)\ **Post date:** [11 November 2026 12:34 UTC](https://forums.allen-heath.com/t/sq-in-comparison-to-qu-3/33365/2 "2026-11-11T12:34:36Z")
Why are you asking this in relation to an “SQ+” model that doesn’t even exist, rather than comparing the existing QU-567 consoles to the SQ567+? Or would you expect A&H to launch an “SQ3+” that features and hardware in some respects superior to that of its larger variants? > [@SteAH](#): > > They could have build the perfect mixer with SQ+ and did not. But why? Evidently, such features would have made an SQ+ model too expensive. > [@The New Addition. SQ+](https://forums.allen-heath.com/t/the-new-addition-sq/32071/25): > > we did stop short of adding some things that ultimately would have pushed the price up too much and we wanted to get as close as possible to the original SQ price points. Thus, the integration of the RackUltra FX engine was more important than the opportunity to rid oneself of certain long-standing drawbacks. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.allen-heath.com/t/sq-in-comparison-to-qu-3/33365)._