I have listened to the samples on the A&H site re the compressor plug ins and the PL76 and the Opto compressors they sound good to me and different from each other
But the A/B presented on the sales page is between Dry and the Plug in - not between:
Dry
Stock Compressor suitably tweaked by audio professional
The PlugIn suitably tweaked
So it is bit hard to know how much different the Opto in particular is to the stock compressor on say Vocals?
Do you have any thoughts?
One reason that the plugins would be great is if they came with really good presets for noobs like me to serve as a start point to get the best out of that specific emulation… do they have presets you can select easily?
Andy
Just start with the basic stage plot that you have always used [on that gig] with that same band before thinking about jumping in to use unfamiliar plugins that you have not tried in a live scenario.
Duplicate your past gig with that band 1stly and save that show.
New desk… Layers… Just allow a few spare channels [as the guys here have said] along side of
your layout
Keep it simple on your first gig with the SQ5
That’s what I would do.
You know how to get a hold of me.
Yep your going to jump in to your first SQ mixer gig in a big way!!
Sounds like a fun band to mix and work with. Of the VERY FEW live music
shows I did this past summer two of the bands were a similar line up.
When I first stepped out into the world of digital mixing I picked an event
that only had a three piece band with a small overall PA set up!!!
At least since you know the band you can program the mixer ahead of time.
Yes-- I know the band well… and I have QU16 saved scenes I can go to pre-configure the desk.
QU to SQ seems a fairly natural transition and I am spending time getting familiar so should be ok provided I don’t go too crazy indulging myself in all the new features.
The interesting thing though is that although the SQ is more “complex” ie. has more features and options, the SQ’s separation of the key concerns of Input socket assignment vs patching vs surface layout and the (relative) ease of these things makes the whole desk so much more logical.
Where it is easy to get confused for a noob is FX routing when using groups–and handling inputs and outputs on the same patching screen makes it a bit counterintuitive to me- always makes me scratch my head somewhat- hard to do these things at speed on the fly if you are still unfamilar I would say.
But it’s an awesome piece of industrial design - I’m a software systems analyst of 30yrs by trade and the SQ blows me away